Here is the latest from Fr. Joe! If you have a question about the Catholic faith, Church history, or just want a clarification on Catholic teaching, here is your chance. Even if you just want some advise on a situation that you are dealing with or need some guidance on your personal faith journey, here is an opportunity to do so. Just email your questions to blog.of.daniel@gmail.com or DBender45@yahoo.com
1) The Catholic Church is opposed to contraception because it negates the life giving power that is a major part marital union. Is it morally acceptable for one to use birth control if it is prescribed by a doctor for other medical conditions?
This is a very good question and one that happens with regular occurrence. The Church has always held a strong prohibition about the use of artificial birth control. This was re-affirmed in the 1968 document, Humane Vitae, by Pope Paul VI. Yet, in terms of using birth control for other reasons, within the same document, there is a line that states “on the other hand, the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result there from—provided such impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever (15) ". Given this provision, it would seem that as long as the rationale for the prescription was indeed for the medical problem, not to regulate birth, one would be allowed to use the medicine.
2) In the last "Five Questions with Fr. Joe," you mentioned the only sin that is unforgivable is a "sin against the Holy Spirit." This response generated some discussion amongst the readers of this blog. What exactly is a sin against the Holy Spirit and why can't it be forgiven? Is this referenced in the Bible?
Even though we commonly say, “sin against the Holy Spirit”, one can find a reference to blaspheming against the Holy Spirit, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, #1864. Click here for a link to the paragraph. http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1864.htm. Scripturally, one finds references to this sin in Mark 3:29, Matthew 12:32, and Luke 12:10. In case you’re worried about committing it, I heard it said once that if you’ve worried about it, you’ve never committed it and probably won’t commit it either. It seems quite intentional to commit.
3) Catholics tend light candles in Churches and at other places (shrines, etc.) at the same time when they offer up a prayer to God. Why do we light candles and are there certain occasions when should or should not light a candle?
I’m not too sure where and when the practice of lighting candles began. However, I think it might be related to the idea of our prayers rising like incense before God, as we hear in Psalm 141. Just as incense rise to the heavens, the lights of candles illuminates and signifies our prayers “lit” before God. Sometimes, during Lent, parishes remove candles, but if there are candles out, one shouldn’t feel that they have to light or not them; whether they’re lit or not, God will hear our prayers.
4) Protestants reference certain scriptural passages in making the argument that priest should not be celibate. Furthermore, St. Peter, our first pope, was married and there were periods in the Church's history where priest were married. What is reason behind the vow of celibacy that priest take? Can you explain how this is a "discipline" and not a "dogma"?
While there are passages that suggest priests should not be celibate, there are passages that suggest some are given a grace to be celibate for the sake of the kingdom, see Matthew 19:12. This is one of those cases that both being married and celibate are to be respected as valued ways of living life. I think it’s important for us to see both marriage and celibacy as important ways of living one’s devotion to Christ. It’s not a dogma, but a discipline, because it doesn’t attain the same level of teaching on things such as the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Eucharist. One quick way of distinguishing, most dogmas are contained in the Nicene Creed, which disciplines are not. In terms of rationale behind the mandatory celibacy for priests, there are several reasons – some spiritual and some practical. One of the most practical, at times, when married priests were dying, Church property was being left to families and not the Church. Secondly, being unmarried allows for a great deal of freedom – it’s easier to move one person than an entire family to a new assignment. Now, it terms of spiritual rationale, there is a belief and from my experience, it’s true, that celibacy allows a priest to be focused on the work of the parish without concern of one’s family. I’d certainly welcome an ongoing discussion of this.
5) What is Canon Law and what are the origins for it? To what extent should the laity (non-clergy members of the Church) be concerned with regarding Canon Law?
Canon law is the law of the Church. Like any other institution, the Church needs rules and Canon Low provides that for us. It provides for many aspects of the Church’s internal make up. One of the reasons laity should be aware of it is because it does continue obligations and rights for the Christian faithful, which need to be assured. You can find a link to the entire body of text on the Vatican website, http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM. You will want to pay special attention to the part on the obligations and rights of all the Christian Faithful, which is Part I of Book II.
This is a very good question and one that happens with regular occurrence. The Church has always held a strong prohibition about the use of artificial birth control. This was re-affirmed in the 1968 document, Humane Vitae, by Pope Paul VI. Yet, in terms of using birth control for other reasons, within the same document, there is a line that states “on the other hand, the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result there from—provided such impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever (15) ". Given this provision, it would seem that as long as the rationale for the prescription was indeed for the medical problem, not to regulate birth, one would be allowed to use the medicine.
2) In the last "Five Questions with Fr. Joe," you mentioned the only sin that is unforgivable is a "sin against the Holy Spirit." This response generated some discussion amongst the readers of this blog. What exactly is a sin against the Holy Spirit and why can't it be forgiven? Is this referenced in the Bible?
Even though we commonly say, “sin against the Holy Spirit”, one can find a reference to blaspheming against the Holy Spirit, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, #1864. Click here for a link to the paragraph. http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1864.htm. Scripturally, one finds references to this sin in Mark 3:29, Matthew 12:32, and Luke 12:10. In case you’re worried about committing it, I heard it said once that if you’ve worried about it, you’ve never committed it and probably won’t commit it either. It seems quite intentional to commit.
3) Catholics tend light candles in Churches and at other places (shrines, etc.) at the same time when they offer up a prayer to God. Why do we light candles and are there certain occasions when should or should not light a candle?
I’m not too sure where and when the practice of lighting candles began. However, I think it might be related to the idea of our prayers rising like incense before God, as we hear in Psalm 141. Just as incense rise to the heavens, the lights of candles illuminates and signifies our prayers “lit” before God. Sometimes, during Lent, parishes remove candles, but if there are candles out, one shouldn’t feel that they have to light or not them; whether they’re lit or not, God will hear our prayers.
4) Protestants reference certain scriptural passages in making the argument that priest should not be celibate. Furthermore, St. Peter, our first pope, was married and there were periods in the Church's history where priest were married. What is reason behind the vow of celibacy that priest take? Can you explain how this is a "discipline" and not a "dogma"?
While there are passages that suggest priests should not be celibate, there are passages that suggest some are given a grace to be celibate for the sake of the kingdom, see Matthew 19:12. This is one of those cases that both being married and celibate are to be respected as valued ways of living life. I think it’s important for us to see both marriage and celibacy as important ways of living one’s devotion to Christ. It’s not a dogma, but a discipline, because it doesn’t attain the same level of teaching on things such as the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Eucharist. One quick way of distinguishing, most dogmas are contained in the Nicene Creed, which disciplines are not. In terms of rationale behind the mandatory celibacy for priests, there are several reasons – some spiritual and some practical. One of the most practical, at times, when married priests were dying, Church property was being left to families and not the Church. Secondly, being unmarried allows for a great deal of freedom – it’s easier to move one person than an entire family to a new assignment. Now, it terms of spiritual rationale, there is a belief and from my experience, it’s true, that celibacy allows a priest to be focused on the work of the parish without concern of one’s family. I’d certainly welcome an ongoing discussion of this.
5) What is Canon Law and what are the origins for it? To what extent should the laity (non-clergy members of the Church) be concerned with regarding Canon Law?
Canon law is the law of the Church. Like any other institution, the Church needs rules and Canon Low provides that for us. It provides for many aspects of the Church’s internal make up. One of the reasons laity should be aware of it is because it does continue obligations and rights for the Christian faithful, which need to be assured. You can find a link to the entire body of text on the Vatican website, http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM. You will want to pay special attention to the part on the obligations and rights of all the Christian Faithful, which is Part I of Book II.
Thanks Fr. Joe!!
No comments:
Post a Comment